It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 3:00 am

Board index » General » WoodsBuggy Talk

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 961
Location: Kettering Ohio
Here is the story. I've been building this buggy for about 6 years now, as most know. The engine is a 2.3 Turbo Ford that is a stroker now at 2.5 liters. Got it running but had an issue with the head I ported, got a little deep, and it leaked water into the oil. The head had a $1000 setup of cam, springs, valves and roller rockers, not to mention machine work. I'm back to a stock head and cam for now. I'm also having a problem with being heavy back there. The 2.0 Airshocks just aren't enough and I need to upgrade to 2.5's. So here's the deal. I can sell this engine off with plenty of leftover money to buy a 2.2 or 2.4 Ecotec and computer. The Ecotec should be plenty light enough to keep my existing suspension. I also won't have to re-do my cylinder head and fork over another $500 for machine work to get the cam and valves in. I have this buggy set up so nice right now with this engine but it kills me that I will have to spend a decent amount of money to get it back to where I need it. Poor planning and trial by fire on my part. Would you all just keep what I have and move forward or sell it off to the mustang crowd and buy an Ecotec and slap it in there. I already have the radiator and all that. Basically just need to re-work the harness, flash the computer, fab an exhaust and motor mounts, and buy and adapter kit. I can probably sell what I have for around $4500-5000 with all the accessories. I'd probably try for the 2.4 Ecotec.

With that said, who has access to a good engine and how much do you want? A reworked harness and flashed computer would just be icing on the cake!

_________________
"Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal." -Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:52 pm
Posts: 774
Location: wooster ohio
i say ecotec but i'm a gm guy and partial. i am starting to mock up the turbo and intercooler off my totaled t-bird turbo coupe on my ecotec. you have the turbo stuff also. just a thought. Also you appear to be a ford guy. i have a focus with the dohc z-tec that has over 260,000 miles and all i have ever done to it is a timing belt. i think that would be a good buggy engine also. as far as ease of install and engine packaging its hard to beat the ecotec

_________________
Turbocharged Ecotec,vanogon midshift,Berrien WoodsBuggy wagon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 961
Location: Kettering Ohio
I'm very partial to Ford and honestly hate GM. I have fought this my entire life with projects. It is so much cheaper and easier to build a 350 small block than it is a 351 Cleveland. A turbo ford is harder to find modern support than an Ecotec. I'm getting less stubborn with age and have decided that I really just want to ride and not stress over working on the stuff. Ecotec is much more modern than what I have. I do believe I have a very reliable engine right now but it's just heavy! Power wise, I'm way ahead right now. My engine with the "good" head on it would make 400-500hp if I wanted it to. Totally unusable with a 094. A waste to even have it really. I could use the extra money from the engine to offset a crappy business year as well. It just kills me to start over when the car was built around this engine.

_________________
"Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal." -Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:42 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Ashland,Ky
Go eco there is a lot of aftermatket support. And a stock will run forevere on a buggy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:42 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Ashland,Ky
Oh and I have a low mileage 2.4 if your interested


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 961
Location: Kettering Ohio
pm sent Terry. Thanks guys, you're making me think pretty hard about this.

_________________
"Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal." -Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:01 am
Posts: 321
Location: Butler, PA
If it would make anyone feel better the ECOTEC was originally designed by GM's Opel division in Germany. It sure ain't your Daddy's Chevy when they can get 1000 HP from it and still have production parts in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:11 pm 
Offline
WB Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 1212
Location: Chattanooga Tennessee
Forty, I hate to see you scrap the Ford but the dollars and cents are hard to ignore. A cobalt SS supercharged 2.2 makes some unreal power. I chose to go with the Acura 3.2 as it was rated a 265 horse bone stock. The computer and harness modifications were a little pricey but I am in it less than 2k cheaper than any VW engine I ever built.

I have a friend that had a pinto 4cyl in his rail, he also went Acura as the weight was about the same as the Ford cast iron. If I had been on this site prior to starting my project I would probably opted for the GM Echotec, They are very common, tons of after market support.

I am contemplating a new two seat project for riding when the wife chooses to stay home. I bought a Honda S2000 engine (not Cheap) as I could run it in Class 5 if I choose to build a competition/ off road car. I just would like to be able to race it when the economy gets better.

I really like your build the car is designed and executed very well. the time you spent was not wasted. We all change directions at some point. I had a very hard time going water cooled as I was an air cooled purist for 18+ years. Times change and unfortunately finances often dictate how our toys are built. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

_________________
Water Cooled Consortium, Chairman of the Build (Former AC purist)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 961
Location: Kettering Ohio
I haven't decided on anything yet. Got the 2.3 running great today. Fixed and oil leak too and it's hitting hard. I still have an issue with employment. This year sucked with my business and I'm just torn what to do. I'd like to have the extra money from this engine but if I can score a job I'll probably keep it. The problem I'm seeing with the Ecotec is the cost and headache of the add on's. They seem to use electric steering on a lot of these cars. Adding an aftermarket pump just adds to the cost. Right now I run the factory Ford pump and it works great. I'm going to run what I have for the moment but if money gets crazy tight I'll sell whatever I need to when it comes to toys. If we could get cold temperatures and some snow I wouldn't worry a bit about any of it. We plow snow in the winter.

_________________
"Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal." -Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:50 pm 
Offline
WB Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 1212
Location: Chattanooga Tennessee
Sorry to hear about the employment situation as I myself am looking hard for employment. It is looking like I am going to have to move again to secure work. We really love it in Tennessee and it just has so many great places to ride. I am glad to hear you got it running good. You can probably adapt the Ford pump to any engine with your fab skills, you might have to find a different drive pulley.

I ran a honda pump on my last buggy, I wish I had kept that setup instead I opted for the cash and sold it to finance the project.

_________________
Water Cooled Consortium, Chairman of the Build (Former AC purist)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:33 pm
Posts: 286
Location: portage county ohio
fortydegnorth wrote:
If we could get cold temperatures and some snow I wouldn't worry a bit about any of it. We plow snow in the winter.


Same here, I'd be fine with a blizzard every week, you would defiantly see my build thread growing. I hope it ain't like last winter or there may not be any build threads from me in a while


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:52 pm
Posts: 774
Location: wooster ohio
fortydegnorth wrote:
The problem I'm seeing with the Ecotec is the cost and headache of the add on's. They seem to use electric steering on a lot of these cars. Adding an aftermarket pump just adds to the cost. .


These did have steering pumps for cars with conventional hydraulic power steering. pump is driven off intake cam at back of the cylinder head.

_________________
Turbocharged Ecotec,vanogon midshift,Berrien WoodsBuggy wagon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

Board index » General » WoodsBuggy Talk

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group