| WoodsBuggy.com http://woodsbuggy.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| ratio rockers??? http://woodsbuggy.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16271 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | reno2165 [ Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | ratio rockers??? |
Recently got a buggy with a 2275 on the back.. its pretty stout as is but am looking for a little more off the bottom, so i was thinking on a set of ratio rockers... dual 40 dellortos, CB ultra mag heads w/ dual springs and 42x37.5 valves.. tall intakes matched ported to heads and what im sure is a 110 cam, but will verify.. jus seeing what would offer the best performance. I know 1.25 and 1.4s are popular but what about a set of 1.3 roller rockers? It was brought in a conversation with a friend who has run alot of hotrod AC motors, and he suggested it... jus looking for knowledge and opinions Thanks |
|
| Author: | ironhorse [ Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ratio rockers??? |
reno josh here we ran 1.25 with the 110 in both motors 2332 and the 2500 and had plenty of bottom i may e wrong here but i think the more ratio you go the less bottom end you will have. |
|
| Author: | Aaron Creech [ Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ratio rockers??? |
1.3 roller rockers would be ok on a 110. Thats as high as I would go on a W-series cam. More lift adds torque |
|
| Author: | jesse [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ratio rockers??? |
I got the 1.4s on my 120 cam and feels good all over |
|
| Author: | Roy [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ratio rockers??? |
Use the 1.3's. They will work good. I would up the compression ratio if you want more off the bottom. Run race fuel. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|